> systems have the highest availability rate possible. Over the last few
> years, I have replaced almost all of our Linux-based servers with FreeBSD,
> due to the quality-control measures that the FreeBSD development team have
> implemented.
Not to start a flame-fest or anything (but who doesn't love em?), I hear
the above quite a lot.
I'm under the firm belief that a decent sys admin can rub either system to
do whatever they want it to do. Not that I am questioning your abilities.
I just get the "yeah, Linux is good, but just try to use it in a
production environment and you'll understand" a lot.
Granted, a lot of Linux distributions are totally unsuited for a server
environment. Compared to that, I could understand why the
server-orientedness of FreeBSD is attractive, but I certainly couldn't put
up a reasonable arguement for either side in Slackware Linux vs. FreeBSD.
Could you?
-MB
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
