On Sat, 18 Dec 1999, David Scheidt wrote: > On Sat, 18 Dec 1999, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > > > > In a nutshell, teergrubing is the name that has been given to a simple > > technique that exploits a small but significant known weakness of most > > SMTP client implementations. This weakness is exploited to either slow > > down or halt the flow of e-mail from some SMTP client to some SMTP server. > > Think about it before you fire it up. You are essentially launching a DOS > attack on somebody's mail server. In some jurisdictions, that's a felony. My mistake. I confused this with some of the other anti-spam measures. Being slow isn't criminal. (fortunatly for me!)_ David To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP... Mike Smith
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP... Nate Williams
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP con... Chris Sedore
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP... Jason Evans
- Re: Practical limit for number o... Chris Sedore
- Re: Practical limit for numb... Jason Evans
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP connections... Ken Bolingbroke
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP connect... Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP connect... Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP con... David Scheidt
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP... David Scheidt
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP... Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP connections... John Polstra
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP connections? Dan Nelson
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP connections? Peter Wemm
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP connections? Jonathan Lemon
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP connections... Jonathan Lemon
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP connections? Peter Jeremy
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP connections? Jason Nordwick
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP connections... Matthew Dillon