In article <local.mail.freebsd-hackers/[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >In my case, load is reasonably distributed. Is poll() really that much >better than select()? I thought that, excepting bit flag manipulations, >it worked basically the same way on the kernel end. Yes, it is better. Select uses the same backend as poll(), but those "bit flag manipulations" that you are talking about consume a measurable amount of CPU time when you start throwing thousands of descriptors at it. -- Jonathan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Practical limit for numb... Jason Evans
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP connections... Ken Bolingbroke
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP connect... Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP connect... Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP con... David Scheidt
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP... David Scheidt
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP... Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP connections... John Polstra
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP connections? Dan Nelson
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP connections? Peter Wemm
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP connections? Jonathan Lemon
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP connections... Jonathan Lemon
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP connections? Peter Jeremy
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP connections? Jason Nordwick
- Re: Practical limit for number of TCP connections... Matthew Dillon