On Sat, 4 Dec 1999, Dennis wrote: > At 10:28 AM 12/4/99 -0700, Wes Peters wrote: > > > Unless they're running your drivers. I'm perfectly willing to accept YOUR > DRIVERS might be less unstable on Linux than FreeBSD. > > "less unstable". Is that a technical term? With a large number of the systems I have dealt with this is the perfectly correct way to describe them. If you are going to make totally > ignorant statements at least try to get the semantics right. David Scheidt To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) FreeBSD
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Christopher Stein
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) FreeBSD
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Kris Kennaway
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Christopher Stein
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Kris Kennaway
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Mike Smith
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Dennis
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Wes Peters
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Dennis
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) David Scheidt
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Wes Peters
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Matthew Dillon
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Wes Peters
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Matthew Dillon
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Wes Peters
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Matthew Dillon
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Kris Kennaway
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Matthew Dillon
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Wes Peters