> > His point was not a claim about performance, rather he was bringing into > > question whether performance was improving with successive releases. > > Sounded very much to me like he was just vaguely griping about how slow > and unstable newer versions of FreeBSD are compared to the good old days. > Dennis will be able to clarify this for us all when he posts his benchmark > specs. Dennis has been whining and griping about just about everything since day one. You can't realistically consider that sort of activity on his part as any sort of metric at all. -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Dennis
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Mike Smith
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Dennis
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Bosko Milekic
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) FreeBSD
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 ma... Christopher Stein
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 ma... FreeBSD
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 ma... Kris Kennaway
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 ma... Christopher Stein
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 ma... Kris Kennaway
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 ma... Mike Smith
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 ma... Dennis
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 ma... Wes Peters
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 ma... Dennis
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 ma... David Scheidt
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 ma... Wes Peters
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 ma... Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 ma... Matthew Dillon
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 ma... Wes Peters
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 ma... Matthew Dillon
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 ma... Wes Peters