Dennis wrote: > > There was a time that when someone reported a problem there was interest in > finding out what it might be. Now you mock the person reporting it. I guess > thats why everyone in the world is using linux. Its disheartening to > realize that things apparently wont be getting much better. If you're insinuating that Linux is more stable and reliable than FreeBSD, you're absolutely and unequivocally wrong. Unless they're running your drivers. I'm perfectly willing to accept YOUR DRIVERS might be less unstable on Linux than FreeBSD. -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://softweyr.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Dennis
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Bosko Milekic
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) FreeBSD
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Christopher Stein
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) FreeBSD
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Kris Kennaway
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Christopher Stein
- RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Kris Kennaway
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Mike Smith
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Dennis
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Wes Peters
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Dennis
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) David Scheidt
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Wes Peters
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Jordan K. Hubbard
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Matthew Dillon
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Wes Peters
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Matthew Dillon
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Wes Peters
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Matthew Dillon
- Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Kris Kennaway