> > as far as I remember ext2 has some "counter". I used to use Linux and > > it performed 'fsck' from time to time (even if fs was clearly unmounted). > > that is a very good thing to have. linux performed a fsck on every 16th boot afaik. This may have been changed but that is how often it occurred when I used linux. This had more to do with the file system becoming fragmented than with it becoming inconsistent. (dont quote me on that.) -don To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EX... Peter Mutsaers
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower tha... Daniel O'Connor
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Don
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Ronald G. Minnich
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Ilia Chipitsine
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Ronald G. Minnich
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Matthew Dillon
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? J McKitrick
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? David Scheidt
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Don
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Joe Abley
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? David Scheidt
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Joe Abley
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Damon M. Conway
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? David Malone
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Soren Schmidt
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Ilia Chipitsine
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Andrew Reilly
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Didier Derny
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Alban Hertroys