On Thu, Oct 28, 1999 at 12:01:10AM +0600, Ilia Chipitsine wrote: > there must be _another_ reason. try to do the same test. You didn't see Mike Smith's explanation? It seemed pretty convincing to me. -- Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? J McKitrick
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? David Scheidt
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Don
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Joe Abley
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? David Scheidt
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Joe Abley
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Damon M. Conway
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? David Malone
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Soren Schmidt
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Ilia Chipitsine
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Andrew Reilly
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Didier Derny
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Alban Hertroys
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Didier Derny
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Kip Macy
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Don Lewis
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Robert Sexton