It seems Ilia Chipitsine wrote: > > FreeBSD-3.3 + softupdates + "# tunefs -o time" + "flags 0xb0ffb0ff" > (kernel was compiled with "-O2") Hmm, if you didn't do a "tunefs -n enable" you are not using softupdates and there is your reason why FreeBSD is slower.. -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Matthew Dillon
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? J McKitrick
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? David Scheidt
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Don
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Joe Abley
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? David Scheidt
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Joe Abley
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Damon M. Conway
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? David Malone
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Soren Schmidt
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Ilia Chipitsine
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Andrew Reilly
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Didier Derny
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Alban Hertroys
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Didier Derny
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Kip Macy
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Don Lewis
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Robert Sexton