On Wed, Oct 27, 1999 at 09:33:20PM +0600, Ilia Chipitsine wrote: I did a similar test ages ago, only I was extracting a version of the Linux kernel. The FreeBSD machine came out about 10% faster, despite the fact it was running squid and had an older, slower disk. FreeBSD: 112.95 109.00 112.14 109.71 111.68 111.41 111.88 Linux: 122.99 122.11 123.35 121.88 121.70 123.47 124.94 I think what you're seeing is the fact that ports is an extream case. If you want to put a system which tries to keep metadata consistant through hell then create lots of small files! You could try and see how working without soft updates and working async changes the timings. (Also - make sure you've set up softupdates correctly - it is quite easy to think you've turned softupdates on and actually have them off!) David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Ronald G. Minnich
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Matthew Dillon
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? J McKitrick
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? David Scheidt
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Don
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Joe Abley
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? David Scheidt
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Joe Abley
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Damon M. Conway
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? David Malone
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Soren Schmidt
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Ilia Chipitsine
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Andrew Reilly
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Didier Derny
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Alban Hertroys
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Didier Derny
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Kip Macy
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Don Lewis
- Re: why FFS is THAT slower than EXT2 ? Robert Sexton