On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 11:14:32AM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote: > You are simply wrong in your characterization of /usr/local. As far > back as I can remember, /usr/local has been used for locally installed [...] Pfft. Everyone has their own way of organizing files. There is no right or wrong. However, the fact that /usr/local is still hardcoded into packages IS a bug. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation David O'Brien
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation Nat Lanza
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation Joe Kelsey
- /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse Brian Dean
- Re: /usr/local abuse Blaz Zupan
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Wes Peters
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- /usr/local abuse Joe Kelsey
- /usr/local abuse Will Andrews
- /usr/local abuse Joe Kelsey
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Joe Kelsey
- Re: /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Crist J. Clark
- Re: /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Warner Losh
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien