On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 01:44:41PM -0500, Brian Dean wrote:
> I think I finally understand what you are complaining about,
Maybe.
> But to say that installing ports into /usr/local is somehow wrong, I
> have to disagree.
Do you understand why NetBSD Packages (ie, the system they took from us)
install into /usr/pkg by default rather than /usr/local ?
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation Andrew Reilly
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation Mike Meyer
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation David O'Brien
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation Warner Losh
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation David O'Brien
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation Nat Lanza
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation Joe Kelsey
- /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse Brian Dean
- Re: /usr/local abuse Blaz Zupan
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Wes Peters
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- /usr/local abuse Joe Kelsey
- Re: /usr/local abuse Will Andrews
- /usr/local abuse Joe Kelsey
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Joe Kelsey
- Re: /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Crist J. Clark
