In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Joe Kelsey writes: : To the extent that NetBSD *forces* the local administrator to use : /usr/pkg, I find it contains the same deficiency. If it does not force : this, then perhaps FreeBSD should adopt it. I have never used NetBSD, : so I cannot comment further on it. I'd point out that make install in the pkgsrc tree installs into /usr/pkg too. So NetBSD doesn't differentiate between locally compiled files and binary packages they supply. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- /usr/local abuse Joe Kelsey
- Re: /usr/local abuse Will Andrews
- /usr/local abuse Joe Kelsey
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Joe Kelsey
- Re: /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Crist J. Clark
- Re: /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Warner Losh
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse Nate Williams
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Brooks Davis
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Brandon D. Valentine
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... David O'Brien
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Mike Meyer
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Matthew Thyer
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Nate Williams
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Mike Meyer