David O'Brien wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 01:44:41PM -0500, Brian Dean wrote: > > I think I finally understand what you are complaining about, > > Maybe. > > > But to say that installing ports into /usr/local is somehow wrong, I > > have to disagree. > > Do you understand why NetBSD Packages (ie, the system they took from us) > install into /usr/pkg by default rather than /usr/local ? Yes, but that doesn't mean I agree with it. In fact, I find it slighly bizarre. I dislike needing a different path on NetBSD than what I have on {Free,Open}BSD. -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://softweyr.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation Mike Meyer
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation David O'Brien
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation Warner Losh
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation David O'Brien
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation Nat Lanza
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation Joe Kelsey
- /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse Brian Dean
- Re: /usr/local abuse Blaz Zupan
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Wes Peters
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- /usr/local abuse Joe Kelsey
- Re: /usr/local abuse Will Andrews
- /usr/local abuse Joe Kelsey
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Joe Kelsey
- Re: /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Crist J. Clark
- Re: /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer