In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Greg Lehey writes: >> >> The problem in vinum/releng4 is the problem greg has been blaming >> on CAM since at least FreeBSDcon and indications seems to be that >> it is actually a malloc/free gottcha in vinum. > >No, this is not correct. The problem you're talking about I blamed >elsewhere, not specifically CAM. To quote from >http://www.lemis.com/vinum/bugs.html: OK, sorry, I havn't heard about it since FreeBSDcon and back then CAM was in the spotlight. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: 2nd call for reviews and tests: buf->bi... Brad Knowles
- Re: 2nd call for reviews and tests: buf->bi... Bill Fumerola
- Re: 2nd call for reviews and tests: buf->bi... Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
- Re: 2nd call for reviews and tests: buf->bio pat... Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
- Re: 2nd call for reviews and tests: buf->bi... Brad Knowles
- Re: 2nd call for reviews and tests: buf->bi... Soren Schmidt
- Vinum breakage (was: 2nd call for reviews and ... Greg Lehey
- Re: 2nd call for reviews and tests: buf->bi... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: 2nd call for reviews and tests: buf->bi... Brad Knowles
- Vinum breakage (was: 2nd call for reviews and ... Greg Lehey
- Re: Vinum breakage (was: 2nd call for reviews ... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Vinum breakage (was: 2nd call for reviews ... Brian Dean
- Re: Vinum breakage Matthew Dillon
- Re: Vinum breakage Jonathan M. Bresler
- Vinum breakage Summary (was Re: Vinum breakage... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Vinum breakage Summary (was Re: Vinum brea... Greg Lehey
- Re: Vinum breakage Matthew Dillon
- Re: Vinum breakage Mathew Kanner
- Re: Vinum breakage Matthew Dillon
- Re: Vinum breakage Brad Knowles
- Re: Vinum breakage Matthew Dillon