It seems Brad Knowles wrote: > > Like I said in a previous message, Poul broke vinum (among other > things) under 4.0-STABLE, and this needs to be fixed ASAP. If Poul > had kept his changes unique to -CURRENT, then 4.0-STABLE wouldn't > have been affected. But he didn't, and it was. Where the fsck did you get the idea that RELENG_4 was broken by Poul's commits to -CURRENT ?? Poul has nothing to do with vinum being broken in RELENG_4... -S�ren To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: 2nd call for reviews and tests: buf->bio pat... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: 2nd call for reviews and tests: buf->bi... Matthew Dillon
- Re: 2nd call for reviews and tests: buf-&g... Adrian Chadd
- Re: 2nd call for reviews and tests: bu... Matthew Dillon
- Re: 2nd call for reviews and tests: bu... Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
- Re: 2nd call for reviews and tests: bu... Brad Knowles
- Re: 2nd call for reviews and tests: bu... Bill Fumerola
- Re: 2nd call for reviews and tests: bu... Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
- Re: 2nd call for reviews and tests: buf-&g... Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
- Re: 2nd call for reviews and tests: bu... Brad Knowles
- Vinum breakage (was: 2nd call for revi... Soren Schmidt
- Vinum breakage (was: 2nd call for revi... Greg Lehey
- Re: 2nd call for reviews and tests: bu... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: 2nd call for reviews and tests: bu... Brad Knowles
- Vinum breakage (was: 2nd call for revi... Greg Lehey
- Re: Vinum breakage (was: 2nd call for ... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Vinum breakage (was: 2nd call for ... Brian Dean
- Re: Vinum breakage Matthew Dillon
- Re: Vinum breakage Jonathan M. Bresler
- Vinum breakage Summary (was Re: Vinum ... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Vinum breakage Summary (was Re: Vi... Greg Lehey
