At 8:14 AM +0200 2000/4/4, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
> Besides, CURRENT does allow for the tree to be broken. I guess Bleeding
> Edge lost its meaning within the FreeBSD ranks.
Yes, but RELENG_4 is no longer -CURRENT. Therefore, different
procedures need to be applied to it, now that it is -STABLE.
> Ehm. Not as if your VM stuff wasn't causing disruption. Needed,
> granted, but disruptive as well. And ucd-snmp has been broken quite
> some time (still is?) due to the work.
> And I know of a lot of people who actively use it.
We use it quite heavily here. In what way is it broken with 4.0-STABLE?
--
These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy
======================================================================
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV
Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124
Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels
http://www.skynet.be || Belgium
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
