Garrett Wollman wrote: > Peter D. and I have been discussing this topic over the past few days, > and I was about to sit down and do the implementation when I saw your > message. I'd appreciate it if you can hold off on yours for a bit. Yes, but why? -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ The FreeBSD project mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals Peter Dufault
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 sig... Peter Dufault
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32... Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32... Garrett Wollman
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more th... Bruce Evans
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 sig... Dmitrij Tejblum
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 sig... Garrett Wollman
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32... Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32... Peter Dufault
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals Peter Dufault
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 sig... Peter Dufault
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32... Peter Dufault
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32... Garrett Wollman
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 sig... John Polstra
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32... Marcel Moolenaar
- (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals Garrett Wollman
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals Marcel Moolenaar