> This is a particularly safe implementation typedef, > since I don't anticipate uint64_t ever being used in a future specification > as a different data type. > I don't know about ANSI. It's in C9x. But not in <signal.h>. The n869 draft has it in <stdint.h> and <inttypes.h> only. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals Peter Dufault
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 sig... Peter Dufault
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32... Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32... Garrett Wollman
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more th... Bruce Evans
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 sig... Dmitrij Tejblum
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 sig... Garrett Wollman
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32... Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32... Peter Dufault
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals Peter Dufault
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 sig... Peter Dufault
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32... Peter Dufault
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32... Garrett Wollman
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 sig... John Polstra