Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals

[Marcel Moolenaar]

Garrett Wollman wrote:
> 
> <<On Mon, 06 Sep 1999 11:03:35 +0200, Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> 
> > Known problems:
> > Building world fails because the freshly built cpp segfaults. A setjmp call
> > that may be involved matches the problem of a return address being 0. gdb
> > does not display a complete backtrace...
> 
> The {,sig}setjmp buffer contains a sigset_t.  The size of a JMP_BUF
> needs to be large enough to make this work.  Additionally, the setjmp
> family currently use the old-style (sigblock/sigsetmask) signal calls,
> which will have to change.

Agreed.

-- 
Marcel Moolenaar                        mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SCC Internetworking & Databases           http://www.scc.nl/
The FreeBSD project                mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message