<<On Mon, 6 Sep 1999 10:08:21 -0400 (EDT), Peter Dufault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > This is a particularly safe implementation typedef, > since I don't anticipate uint64_t ever being used in a future specification > as a different data type. > I don't know about ANSI. It's in C9x. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same [EMAIL PROTECTED] | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals Peter Dufault
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 sig... Peter Dufault
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32... Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32... Garrett Wollman
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more th... Bruce Evans
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 sig... Dmitrij Tejblum
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 sig... Garrett Wollman
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32... Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32... Peter Dufault
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals Peter Dufault
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 signals Marcel Moolenaar
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32 sig... Peter Dufault
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32... Peter Dufault
- Re: (P)review: sigset_t for more than 32... Garrett Wollman