Am 19.12.2015 14:19 schrieb "Jonas Maebe" <jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be>: > > On 18/12/15 10:12, Lukasz Sokol wrote: >> >> I know FreePascal is not Linux, the Team is not Torvalds etc;) >> but have you seen this ? >> >> https://lwn.net/Articles/233482/ > > > Maybe a "volatile" intrinsic, just like we already have an "unaligned" intrinsic, would indeed be a better idea than adding the possibility to mark data as volatile. As an extra plus, it would map directly onto LLVM :) (which also only supports "volatile" as an attribute for load/store instructions).
I've had the same thought when I read the article. :) Regards, Sven
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
