Am 18.12.2015 um 12:16 schrieb R. Diez: > > I see. Based on that information, and on the issue of function calls > crossing units, I guess you could rephrase that in much less-friendly > way. I'm playing evil advocate now: "FreePascal is so simple it can only > optimise properly the kind of hand-written tight loops that you normally > find in artificial benchmarks." }8-) >
Actually, it is the other way round: FPC is not interested in optimziations taking a lot of time and mainly having a purpose in artifical benchmarks. E.g. spending a lot of time in optimizing globals variable access is for real world programs normally not really usefull as the number of global variables in good programs is really low. Of course, if you are interested in highly optimized code squeezing out every processor cycle, you do not care about compilation times and you are only interested in embedded programming, FPC is not the right tool for you and this will not change. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
