On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Tobias Oelgarte <tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> That is more or less a search and time issue. If you search for a > cucumber and a sexual related image ranks first instead of an actual > cucumber then it would be time to improve the search function. If we > have not enough people categorizing images the right way, we might start > to recruit more helpers. Equally it is mildly amusing to get a picture of an actual gherkin, if one uses the search term "London Gherkin". The age old answer to this problem is to scroll down the search results. We didn't like it when google was prejudicially priviledging other results above ones from wikipedia (a practise they no longer adhere to). I don't see much of a difference here. -- -- Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]] _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
