On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 4:36 PM, WereSpielChequers <werespielchequ...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > We already have a no censorship policy that makes various exceptions. For > Example Paedophilia advocates get blocked on site on EN wikipedia. There > may in the past have been a consensus against any change to that policy, > but there hasn't been a recent site wide reconsideration of that consensus. > DE Wikipedia had an overwhelming vote, but they may not reflect views on > the rest of the site, and not being a German speaker I'm not sure to what > extent their vote was a decisive rejection of the proposal that was then on > the table or a rejection of filtering in principle. Am I being dense, or are you being silly? Blocking advocacy from a site with a NPOV policy is a bajillion miles from being censorship. What? I am wrong? How so? -- -- Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]] _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
