On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Andre Engels <andreeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen > <cimonav...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Am I being dense, or are you being silly? Blocking advocacy from a site with >> a NPOV policy is a bajillion miles from being censorship. > > It may be a bajillion miles, I still think it's closer to it than > giving the possibility to people to decide what they themselves see or > not see is. Apart from that, pedophiles are being blocked even if > they are not advocating, if I remember correctly. >
In the absolute, to follow teh rather perverse logci, No. Pedophiles are not blocked for their views, they are blocked because their behaviour on the site is agains our principles, very much like why we block people who by their actions want to censor wikipedia. -- -- Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]] _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
