So it means that Flex in AS2 was not flex?
Le 15/11/2012 20:50, Alex Harui a écrit :
On 11/15/12 11:44 AM, "sébastien Paturel" <sebpatu.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
Why do you thing that using AS4 is the better choice?
It brings me back to the thread (what is the essence of Flex?) In my
opinion, flex is not tight to actionscript.
IMO, Flex is AS3. My assumption is that there are large bodies of AS
business logic that folks are not wanting to port to something else. Of
course, that assumption could be incorrect.
