On 16 January 2012 22:19, Michel Boudreau <michelboudr...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't really see the reason to have Signals added to Flex, especially if > it's already possible to just add it as a separate library.
I totally agree. Not that I don't like Signals but I like having choice. Rather than deciding which libraries should be merged to the framework I'd concentrate on ensuring that it's easy to develop competing libraries which stimulates progress. The good example of this healthy competition is current Flex IoC frameworks landscape. Isn't it nicer than a single "official" Cairngorm framework recommended by Adobe few years ago? Cheers, Iwo
