On 1/5/12 12:48 AM, "DiMiTRi" <k...@noos.fr> wrote:
>
> Alex, can you elaborate of the reasons of Adobe's choice?
> I really think the signed RSLs were one of the most important factor of Flex
> adoption, because it helped to convince clients that the framework size was
> not a real issue.
It comes down to liability. If Adobe did not test it, they don't want to
certify it, and even if Apache signed it, Adobe still doesn't want
responsibility.
I know for a fact that several enterprise apps are not using RSLs because
they've already made monkey-patches to the framework.
Are you sure your apps are benefiting from signed RSLs and that using more
modules wouldn't make your app faster?
Anyway, I agree it will be problem, but we will have to learn to live with
it. My longer term goal is to make RSLs obsolete by improving modularity in
the framework.
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
