Adobe will not be caching RSLs from Apache so yes, we want to reduce the need for caching RSLs in the future.
On 1/4/12 1:34 PM, "Roland Zwaga" <rol...@stackandheap.com> wrote: > Its kind of sad since the framework RSL's then won't be put in the player's > trusted cache, but then again, if the SDK gets better modularized there > won't be a need to download half a meg worth of framework for a small > application. > So in the end, the trusted cache won't be missed hopefully... > > 2012/1/4 João Fernandes <joaopedromartinsfernan...@gmail.com> > >> On 1/4/2012 9:27 PM, Douglas Arthur wrote: >> >>> I was just thinking about RSL's and how Adobe hosts the framework RSL's >>> on their servers. Will these be migrated over to Apache, or remain on >>> Adobe's servers, or both? If they become hosted on Apache, will they be >>> setup outside of an incubator uri so they don't ever have to change again? >>> Has anyone considered this yet? >>> >>> Example: http://fpdownload.adobe.com/**pub/swz/flex/4.5.1.21328/** >>> framework_4.5.1.21328.swz<http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/swz/flex/4.5.1.213 >>> 28/framework_4.5.1.21328.swz> >>> >>> - Doug >>> >>> From what I understood, they have no plans to host non Adobe swz for now >> so any future release of the SDK will only use regular swfs as RSLs. >> >> João Fernandes >> > > -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
