I'm pretty sure that will never happen, Adobe will never sign something that they're not responsible for. If Apache releases an SDK with a glaring security hole in it somewhere, Adobe will take the fall. Sorry for being pessimistic, but I don't see it happening. But I'll be glad to be proven wrong :)
On 5 January 2012 09:48, DiMiTRi <k...@noos.fr> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> > > > > Adobe will not be caching RSLs from Apache so yes, we want to reduce the >> need for caching RSLs in the future. >> > > Alex, can you elaborate of the reasons of Adobe's choice? > I really think the signed RSLs were one of the most important factor of > Flex adoption, because it helped to convince clients that the framework > size was not a real issue. > > Without it, the Apache Flex would start with a big step backward, that I > fear could have great consequences to its future adoption. > > Can't Adobe and Apache work out a solution to maintain this important > feature? > > Thanks. > > Dimitri K. > -- regards, Roland -- Roland Zwaga Senior Consultant | Stack & Heap BVBA +32 (0)486 16 12 62 | rol...@stackandheap.com | http://www.stackandheap.com
