On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 1:26 AM Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:24:34AM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > On 11/13/19, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 12:48:09PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > >> If this filter is same speed or better than boxblur, it should replace > > >> boxblur filter, as boxblur filter is GPL. > > > > > > relicensing boxblur should not be hard if someone needs the code to be > > > under lgpl > > > > I do not think so, look at geq, lots of devs no longer contactable, > > who did you already contact about boxblur relicensing ? > i looked at the log and at the changes and i see noone i think wouldnt > reply whos change couldnt be rewritten in less than 5minutes > maybe someone could be on vacation and not check their email for a month ... > > you know, just tell me who is the problem and which lines and ill either > contact them, rewrite the code or just revert their change > > Thanks > I am OK if we can relicese the boxblur and drop this patch.
BTW: https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/patch/16246/ is the other blur :) _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
