On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:24:34AM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 11/13/19, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 12:48:09PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote: > >> If this filter is same speed or better than boxblur, it should replace > >> boxblur filter, as boxblur filter is GPL. > > > > relicensing boxblur should not be hard if someone needs the code to be > > under lgpl > > I do not think so, look at geq, lots of devs no longer contactable,
who did you already contact about boxblur relicensing ? i looked at the log and at the changes and i see noone i think wouldnt reply whos change couldnt be rewritten in less than 5minutes maybe someone could be on vacation and not check their email for a month ... you know, just tell me who is the problem and which lines and ill either contact them, rewrite the code or just revert their change Thanks [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB If you fake or manipulate statistics in a paper in physics you will never get a job again. If you fake or manipulate statistics in a paper in medicin you will get a job for life at the pharma industry.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
