On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 10:25:31AM +0800, Steven Liu wrote: > > > > 在 2019年11月13日，09:02，myp...@gmail.com 写道： > > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 7:24 AM Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> On 11/13/19, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > >>> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 12:48:09PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote: > >>>> If this filter is same speed or better than boxblur, it should replace > >>>> boxblur filter, as boxblur filter is GPL. > >>> > >>> relicensing boxblur should not be hard if someone needs the code to be > >>> under lgpl > >> > >> I do not think so, look at geq, lots of devs no longer contactable, > >> > > Maybe we can keep both based on the license choice > I think your suggestion is better :D
I think the best is to get boxblur relicensed to LGPL and then put any improvments, if there are improvments into it. Avoiding a 2nd filter which does the same thing and using the filter name and syntax users already know Thanks [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Does the universe only have a finite lifespan? No, its going to go on forever, its just that you wont like living in it. -- Hiranya Peiri
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
