On 6/5/2017 11:33 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 4:29 PM, James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 6/4/2017 8:49 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >>> On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 01:08:39PM -0300, James Almer wrote: >>>> This test the demuxer discarding non ADTS frames at the beginning and >>>> end of the input. >>>> >>>> As a side effect, this commit also enables fate-adts-demux, which was >>>> accidentally disabled in 324f0fbff1245f9e9e1dda29ecb03138a2de287d. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> >>>> --- >>>> Sample is in http://0x0.st/6gI.aac >>> >>> uploaded, we can change it though if a smaller file is wanted before >>> the test is pushed >> >> Well, i want it mainly because framecrc is much more informative and >> clearly reflects what this patch fixed, unlike crc. >> Since the sample i posted above is 130 frames long it would make a huge >> framecrc ref file, so my question was if a small sample that probes with >> a score of 1 is a good idea for the test or too fragile. >> > > If its not really a probe test, you could just set a fixed format and > avoid any issues from that entirely. > > - Hendrik
Alright, i'll do that. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
