On 6/4/2017 8:49 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 01:08:39PM -0300, James Almer wrote: >> This test the demuxer discarding non ADTS frames at the beginning and >> end of the input. >> >> As a side effect, this commit also enables fate-adts-demux, which was >> accidentally disabled in 324f0fbff1245f9e9e1dda29ecb03138a2de287d. >> >> Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> >> --- >> Sample is in http://0x0.st/6gI.aac > > uploaded, we can change it though if a smaller file is wanted before > the test is pushed
Well, i want it mainly because framecrc is much more informative and clearly reflects what this patch fixed, unlike crc. Since the sample i posted above is 130 frames long it would make a huge framecrc ref file, so my question was if a small sample that probes with a score of 1 is a good idea for the test or too fragile. > > test passes on linux x86 32/64 arm, mips and mingw32/64 > > thx > > [...] > > > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
