On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 4:29 PM, James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6/4/2017 8:49 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 01:08:39PM -0300, James Almer wrote: >>> This test the demuxer discarding non ADTS frames at the beginning and >>> end of the input. >>> >>> As a side effect, this commit also enables fate-adts-demux, which was >>> accidentally disabled in 324f0fbff1245f9e9e1dda29ecb03138a2de287d. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> >>> --- >>> Sample is in http://0x0.st/6gI.aac >> >> uploaded, we can change it though if a smaller file is wanted before >> the test is pushed > > Well, i want it mainly because framecrc is much more informative and > clearly reflects what this patch fixed, unlike crc. > Since the sample i posted above is 130 frames long it would make a huge > framecrc ref file, so my question was if a small sample that probes with > a score of 1 is a good idea for the test or too fragile. >
If its not really a probe test, you could just set a fixed format and avoid any issues from that entirely. - Hendrik _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
