On 11/18/16, Kyle Swanson <k...@ylo.ph> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Kyle Swanson <k...@ylo.ph> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Here's a couple of patches which update the ebur128 filter to use the >> recently added ebur128 API. This updated filter allows fine-tuned >> control over which EBU R128 parameters are measured, and provides >> modest speed increases over the previous ebur128 filter. Also >> noteworthy: this removes the video output option of the ebur128 >> filter. This is extraneous for an ebur128 measurement filter IMHO, but >> if we wanted to keep similar functionality in FFmpeg, we'd be better >> served by a new video source filter where custom meters could be >> created via exported frame metadata. >> >> The first patch adds true peak functionality to the ebur128 API using >> swresample (this was already discussed a little bit: >> http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2016-November/202583.html) >> The second patch is an update to the ebur128 filter. >> >> Kyle > > Here's a v2 for the second patch. Fixes the vla error. >
If this patch removes video output of ebur128 scanner it is unacceptable to me. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
