On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:04:46AM -0600, Kyle Swanson wrote: > Hi, > > Here's a couple of patches which update the ebur128 filter to use the > recently added ebur128 API. This updated filter allows fine-tuned > control over which EBU R128 parameters are measured, and provides > modest speed increases over the previous ebur128 filter. Also > noteworthy: this removes the video output option of the ebur128 > filter. This is extraneous for an ebur128 measurement filter IMHO, but > if we wanted to keep similar functionality in FFmpeg, we'd be better > served by a new video source filter where custom meters could be > created via exported frame metadata. > > The first patch adds true peak functionality to the ebur128 API using > swresample (this was already discussed a little bit: > http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2016-November/202583.html) > The second patch is an update to the ebur128 filter. > > Kyle
src/libavfilter/af_ebur128.c: In function ‘write_strings’: src/libavfilter/af_ebur128.c:121:9: error: variable length array ‘sample_peak’ is used [-Werror=vla] src/libavfilter/af_ebur128.c:133:9: error: variable length array ‘true_peak’ is used [-Werror=vla] [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB If you think the mosad wants you dead since a long time then you are either wrong or dead since a long time.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
