On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:04:46AM -0600, Kyle Swanson wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Here's a couple of patches which update the ebur128 filter to use the >> recently added ebur128 API. This updated filter allows fine-tuned >> control over which EBU R128 parameters are measured, and provides >> modest speed increases over the previous ebur128 filter. Also >> noteworthy: this removes the video output option of the ebur128 >> filter. This is extraneous for an ebur128 measurement filter IMHO, but >> if we wanted to keep similar functionality in FFmpeg, we'd be better >> served by a new video source filter where custom meters could be >> created via exported frame metadata. >> >> The first patch adds true peak functionality to the ebur128 API using >> swresample (this was already discussed a little bit: >> http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2016-November/202583.html) >> The second patch is an update to the ebur128 filter. >> >> Kyle > > src/libavfilter/af_ebur128.c: In function ‘write_strings’: > src/libavfilter/af_ebur128.c:121:9: error: variable length array > ‘sample_peak’ is used [-Werror=vla] > src/libavfilter/af_ebur128.c:133:9: error: variable length array ‘true_peak’ > is used [-Werror=vla]
Thanks. Didn't realize this wasn't allowed. Easy fix. > > [...] > -- > Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB > > If you think the mosad wants you dead since a long time then you are either > wrong or dead since a long time. > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
