On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 10:08:41PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote: > On 01/31/2016 03:07 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 01:27:22PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote: > >>I don't really appreciate that you're doing things behind my back, > >>Michael. There's nothing mentioned on the ffmpeg-devel mailing lis > > > >indeed, i should have clearly stated that i applied the pal8 > >patches with the plan to use pal8 only when neccessary. > >I had asked you to implement exactly that but it seemed you didnt > >know how to do that cleanly and simply so i thought "no problem, > >i know how to do that, ill do it" > >i had not expected this to be controversal > > > > > > Even if you stubbornly decide to keep your patch, it is incorrect > anyway. If a 1 bpp AVI contains a palette, black & white or not,
If a AVI contains a palette one might argue its a paletted avi either way i dont know, i dont have such a file it would be needed to have real world files in that category to know if treating them as pal8 is better or not [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB it is not once nor twice but times without number that the same ideas make their appearance in the world. -- Aristotle
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
