On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 10:33:33PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote: > On 01/31/2016 10:31 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > >If a AVI contains a palette one might argue its a paletted avi > >either way i dont know, i dont have such a file > >it would be needed to have real world files in that category > >to know if treating them as pal8 is better or not > > > > > > So, will you apply my patch? Or are you willing to change to this > funny logic for every file format that uses 1 bpp? As I said, both 2 > and 4 bpp uses pal8 internally, and nobody seems to complain about > that. I'm beginning to get rather tired of this.
this decission should be made by other developers, who where not involved in this disagreement, that should result in a outcome that represents the preferrances of the community better. [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB When you are offended at any man's fault, turn to yourself and study your own failings. Then you will forget your anger. -- Epictetus
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
