On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 01:39:13AM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote: > On 01/25/2016 01:31 AM, Mats Peterson wrote: > >On 01/25/2016 01:30 AM, Mats Peterson wrote: > > > >>Well, this one is still incorrect, since it doesn't cater for different > >>strides. > >> > >>Mats > >> > > > >I would like you to focus on version 5 that I've both mailed to you and > >posted here. > > > >Mats > > > > And why did you omit the 8 bpp changes for AVI? That's what this > patch (or version 5 rather) is about.
put bluntly, because iam not convinced that this is valid in AVI IIUC you created a avi file with a palette and a blue entry and 1bpp and then modified ffmpeg to display that with blue. ok but is that correct, does microsofts player display that with blue too? does the AVI spec say that 1bpp has a palette? do unmodified avi files exist out in the wild that have 1bpp palettes? if 1bpp in AVI is per spec and MS reference supposed to have a palette then we should too and iam happy with the change otherwise we should keep mono for avi [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB I have never wished to cater to the crowd; for what I know they do not approve, and what they approve I do not know. -- Epicurus
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel