Le nonidi 19 fructidor, an CCXXIII, Ronald S. Bultje a écrit : > Ah, ok, so we did test it, and it didn't work. That sounds like an amazing > reason to remove it. Do we really want people to think corresponds to > "FFmpeg quality"? I would be embarrassed if people pointed this out to me. > > When people use FFmpeg, I want them to be filled with joy, not annoyed at > our supposed incompetence.
So basically, according to you, when a feature stops working, the mature and normal thing to do is to remove it? Does it apply to all features, or just the ones that you personally do not care about it? Features can be removed when they are barely used and too expensive to maintain, but that can not be a offhand decision. I hardly expect our users to be filled with joy if you decide arbitrarily to remove a feature they care about. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
