On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 11:55:17PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: [...] > I have no strong opinion on the choice itself, actually.
Same here. Though, I tend to agree with the removal as long as it is properly explained. To me, losing the ABI compatibility should not be an issue, because so far it seems no downstream trusted it. To my understanding, it was introduced as a way to simplify distribution work into integrating both FFmpeg and Libav. The only concerned distribution by this issue solved the problem differently. To the best of my knowledge, no one else is concerned. Still, the change of policy and its consequences should be clearly stated. -- Clément B.
pgpmN2gZ0kA9r.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
