On 9/6/2015 5:23 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: >> Le decadi 20 fructidor, an CCXXIII, James Almer a écrit : >>> Is it confirmed that we are not ABI compatible at all with libav? >> >> It is confirmed that we are not 100% compatible. Nothing more accurate than >> that. >> >> But that does not matter, it could be fixed. What matters is what we want. >> Apparently, people do not want to be compatible anymore. > > Correct me if I am wrong, but the people you are referring to are > ffmpeg devs and do not represent libav. This is relevant to both > projects, so I think their opinions should be considered as well.
I don't see why. Compatibility was always something only we cared about. It was never something that affected them positively or negatively. In fact, most of the "incompatible-libav-abi" changes were done because libav didn't take compatibility with ffmpeg into consideration when reimplementing existing functionality. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
