> -----Original Message----- > From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of softworkz . > Sent: Montag, 2. Juni 2025 11:31 > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] The "bad" Patch > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of Nicolas > > George > > Sent: Montag, 2. Juni 2025 09:58 > > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> > > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] The "bad" Patch > > > > Michael Niedermayer (HE12025-06-02): > > > Id like you to be in the next community committee. (together with marth64) > > > > Sorry, but Are you out of your mind? > > > > > Because it seems you seriously care about stoping defamations and the > > > general sozial backstabbing that has appeared in the recent decade > > > > “Seems” is the important word here. > > > > Regards, > > > > -- > > Nicolas George > > _______________________________________________ > > > Yes, the "seems" is accurate in your perception - but you are also > the only one with that perception. > > This is because you are the one (and only one) for whom I make an > exception. All rules are lifted, so that I can adequately respond > to your inevitable, sometimes more and sometimes less hidden insults. > > This means that you are the only person here which I'm deliberately > and intentionally insulting. It's a quid-pro-quo, and I think > we're even in this regard. > But there's an important distinction: It's always that you serve > and I return. It never originates from my side. > > If you write friendly, I return friendly, but as you are unable to > write even three consecutive sentences which are sincerely friendly > and without any half-hidden, disguised, alluded or implied indirect > or direct insults, you just never get to see a friendly response > from me. > > Sometimes it makes fun to respond to your disgusting scribblings > with a text that you deserve. > But overall, I would much prefer when you would write, without > all those despicable side lines - simple and friendly like a > normal person would do. > > Best regards > sw > _______________________________________________
An afterthought: Somehow I used to believe that it would be clear to everybody, and never thought about it more - but maybe it isn't that obvious like I used to assume: The way I'm responding to NG is in no way how I am personally. I am writing that way because I _can_ write that way and I think he deserves to be responded that way, even more after the CC had officially stated that they concluded that there's nothing they can do about it. But this has nothing to do with myself, there's no other person in the world to which I wrote or write like this. It's a very exclusive subscription, holding up a mirror to provide a glimpse into his own deviance. softworkz _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
