On Sat, May 31, 2025 at 05:34:14PM +0000, softworkz . wrote: > CONCLUSIONS > =========== > > Meanwhile it should have become clear that this conversation is not about > whether the 15/15 patchset gets or should have gotten included or not. > It's about the things that happened around it and how they happened: > > => False statements like I would have pushed without addressing all reviews > > => A patch that was quickly brandmarked even though almost nobody had looked > at it > without any discussion and assessment > > => Claims like "softworkz is pushing bad patches" > > => softworkz shouldn't have been given commit rights > > => it's the worst patchset in the history of the project > > > That chain of events is what is just not acceptable. > It is in no way adequate or appropriate. > > Everybody who has been part of that chain should think about this. > I'm sure that many didn't have the intention to achieve this outcome. > > But unfortunately, there's one or another who has worked on moving this > forward in a way to achieve that outcome exactly. > To those persons, I want to be very clear: Trying those things on me will > never work out, as I will always try 10 times harder against it and the > result for those will be very different and more impactful in case anybody > would ever try again to strategically and purposefully and against better > knowledge defame or discredit me. > > > I don't want all this. I don't want to deal with such things, I just want > to collaborate in a friendly and professional way. Anybody - without > exception - who is getting back to me in a friendly way will receive a > friendly response, no matter what happened yesterday. I have no hard feelings > in this at all - it's just work and it has been pretty annoying that > I had to write all those messages. Still, I cannot leave all those untrue > statements lying around without context. > > You will see a number of messages which are linking to this conversation > from other conversations. I apologize in advance for that spam, but it > wasn't me who created the situation.
Not sure if 90% of people agree or 90% disagree with me but Id like you to be in the next community committee. (together with marth64) Because it seems you seriously care about stoping defamations and the general sozial backstabbing that has appeared in the recent decade and also documenting precissely what everyone said. Just seems these attributes would be valuable for the community committee thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Avoid a single point of failure, be that a person or equipment.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
