softworkz . (HE12025-05-28): > Also, I cannot > consider people as trustworthy while they are going crazy.
Oh, yes, I dare say insulting your betters is the best strategy. I have no qualms saying « your betters » since I was barely involved in this discussion. > Misunderstanding 1: What is being launched? > =========================================== Explaining that there are a lot more code involved in this feature than just a web browser is not the winning argument you think it is, quite the opposite. People have pointed to you the use of system() because it is an focal point of all the wrong things, an easy way to get into the documentation and learn about the issues of what you are doing. > As far as I'm seeing it, an API can hardly be intrinsically bad. This is just an incredibly shortsighted statement. Somebody capable of saying something like that cannot be trusted with the design of an API. > I have no intentions towards getting this merged. Good. Maye get over yourself and find a safe way of implementing it instead of using it as an excuse to play the victim. Also, for pity's sake, stop sucking all the air from this mailing-list. -- Nicolas George, willing to endorse the necessary bad role here _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
