Marton Balint <cus <at> passwd.hu> writes: > Consider you have a 25i source, and you want 30i (60p for display) > > Are you referring to this filter chain for deinterleaving? > > -vf il=l=d:c=d,framerate=30,il=l=i:c=i,yadif=1 > > And this for deinterlacing? > > -vf yadif=1,framerate=60,interlace,yadif=1
The original task afaiu was not to provide a progressive output stream (in that case, deinterlacing first is of course correct) but to provide an interlaced stream. (I don't care about the reason.) I thought - and it seems that Robert agrees now - that apart from being faster, deinterleaving has a good chance of providing better quality. > The second is much, much better. Why do you think so? (Apart from the fact that I don't understand the filterchain "interlace,yadif": It never makes sense imo.) Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
